Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, A Professional Corporation  
Ober|Kaler Health Law Alert - Fall/Winter 2004




In this Issue

From the Chair

Guide to Terms

Welcome

Ober|Kaler in Print

Hospitals
Hospital Discounts to Uninsured Patients

OIG Activity
OIG Advisory Opinions

OIG Alert: Added Charges for Covered Services

CMS Developments
Unsolicited/Voluntary Medicare Refund Requirements

CMS Accepts Electronic Comments

Pharma
CMP Rule, Guidance Set Gauge for Drug Card Sponsors

Medco Settlement Excludes FCA Claim Citing Compliance Plan Deficiencies

Nonphysician Practitioners
Hospital "Credentialing" of Nonphysician Employees

Compliance
The Evolution of Risk Management to Corporate Compliance and Beyond

OIG Updates Hospital Compliance Program Guidance

AdvaMed Code Curtails Lavish Spending

Reimbursement
CMS Proposes Changes to Reimbursement Appeal Rules

Revised Policies Affect Direct Deposit Medicare Funds

New Changes to Medicare Medical Education Rules

FY 2005 Wage Index: Where Are You Now?

Self-Referral
CMS Sets Criteria for Specialty Hospital Moratorium

EMTALA
New EMTALA Guidance

EMTALA Compliance - Practical Considerations

FCA
First Circuit: Rule 9(b) Applies to FCA Actions

Standard for Dismissal Misapplied in Qui Tam Case

Government Required to Exhaust Administrative Remedies in Non-FCA Case

Litigation/ADR
University of Washington PATH Settlement is Largest Yet

Fraud Statute Unconstitutional

Tax
Beyond Saber Rattling: Congress Threatens Aggressive Regulation of Nonprofits

Business
Consider Broker-Dealer Compliance in Stock and Securities Sales

 

OIG Alert: Added Charges for Covered Services

Michele M. Vicente, CLA
Paralegal

The OIG issued an Alert in March 2004 reminding physicians participating in the Medicare program that they risk substantial penalties and exclusion from Medicare and other federal health care programs if they charge Medicare patients additional amounts for covered services, other than the applicable coinsurance and deductible. The Alert was prompted by reports of physicians charging patients "extra fees for already covered services" in violation of the terms of the physicians' assignment agreements.

Rather than focusing on the practice of balance billing, commonly understood to be inappropriate, the Alert points to the $600 annual fee that a physician was asking his patients, including Medicare patients, to pay under a "Personal Health Care Medical Care Contract." The OIG alleged that the fee constituted a violation of the physician's assignment agreement because a number of the contracted services (e.g., coordination of care with other providers, comprehensive assessment and plan for optimum health, and extra time spent on patient care) were Medicare covered services. The language of the Alert would not appear to prohibit payments for otherwise noncovered services.

According to the Alert, the physician resolved the OIG's allegations by paying the OIG an undisclosed settlement amount and agreeing to stop offering the contracts to his patients

Copyright© 2004, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver