Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, A Professional Corporation  
Ober|Kaler Health Law Alert - Spring 2005




In this Issue

From the Chair

Congratulations

Guide to Terms

Ober|Kaler in Print

OIG Activity
OIG Approves Six Gainsharing Arrangements

OIG Advisory Opinions

OIG 2005 Work Plan

CMS Developments
CMS Proposes Plan to Pay Unpaid Costs of Emergency Health Care

Trailblazer Fraud Alert Reveals Provider Identity Theft

Long Term Care
Discerning the New Pressure Ulcer Guidelines

Pharma
TAP Pharmaceuticals Settles with Lupron Consumers

Hospitals
Pay for Performance: Will Your Hospital Be Ready?

Nonphysician Practitioners
"Incident To" Rule Changes

Compliance
OIG Finalizes Supplemental Hospital Compliance Guidance

OIG's Supplemental Hospital CPG Looks at Hospital-based Physicians

OIG/AHLA Release Second Compliance Resource

Reimbursement
IRF "75 Percent Rule" Blocked

Correct Minor Errors and Omissions Without Appeals

Self-referral
Hospitals Meet "Under-development"

FCA
Courts Apply Strict Interpretation of Officer or Employee Under FCA

Lack of Pharmaceutical Recycling Guidance Precludes FCA Liability

Questionable Incentive Program Raises FCA Liability

Enforcement
Supreme Court Declares Sentencing Guidelines "Advisory"

Tax
IRS Penalizes Health System for PAC/Payroll Deduction Plan

Antitrust
DOJ/FTC Report on Antitrust in Health Care

Physican Focus
Physician Retention Arrangements: Stark and Antikickback Issues

Employment
Alien Certification Exemption to Avert Staffing Crisis

 

Correct Minor Errors and Omissions Without Appeals

Leslie Demaree Goldsmith
410-347-7333
ldgoldsmith@ober.com

Section 937 of the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) directs the Secretary to develop, in consultation with Medicare contractors and representatives of providers and suppliers, a process to allow the correction of minor errors or omissions without the need to initiate an appeal. The deadline for implementing this provision was set at one year after enactment of the MMA, i.e., December 8, 2004. In response, CMS did not develop any new process, but rather issued a statement outlining current processes which it asserts adequately provide for correcting minor errors and omissions without the need for appeal. This statement can be found at www.cms.hhs.gov/medlearn/matters/
mmarticles/2004/SE0420.pdf
.

CMS describes four processes. The first is the correction of incomplete or invalid claim submissions. Applicable procedures are outlined in the Medicare Claims Processing Manual at section 80.3.2 (Handling Incomplete or Invalid Claims) and section 70.2.3.1 (Incomplete or Invalid Submissions). Incomplete submissions are those missing required information; invalid submissions contain complete information but the information is illogical or incorrect. Claims with missing or incorrect information for certain specified items are considered unprocessable and "returned' to the provider. Such claims may actually be returned to the provider for correction and resubmission, or may be held with the request that the provider supply the corrected or missing information. No appeal is required under these processes to correct information necessary to process the claim.

The second mechanism discussed by CMS is the correction of mistakes in previously processed claims, known as the adjustment request process. This process is required when bills have been accepted and posted in error to a particular record. Further information is set forth in the Medical Claims Processing Manual, chapter 3, section 50.

A reopening can provide relief without the need for an appeal. Reopenings are permitted pursuant to the statute and regulations, and discussed in the Medicare Claims Processing Manual at chapter 29, section 60.27. However, providers should note that reopenings are at the sole discretion of the intermediary or carrier. Thus, a provider that wants to preserve its rights to have the issues heard by a higher authority should file a formal appeal. Generally, there is a one-year window for requesting a reopening of a carrier initial determination and a three-year window for requesting a reopening of an intermediary determination. Although the CMS instructions assert that adjustments to claims arising from clerical errors must be handled through the reopening process, such errors may be pursued through the appeal process.

The fourth and final mechanism discussed by CMS involves correction of compliance issues related to HIPAA matters. Where there is an evaluation of a claim's compliance with HIPAA, the process established is set forth in the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, chapter 24, sections 30.6, 70.1, and 70.2.

Copyright© 2005, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver